1996 Acura Integra vs. 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C
To start off, 1996 Acura Integra is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,443 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 230 kg more than 1996 Acura Integra.
Because 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Acura Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Acura Integra has automatic transmission and 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C has manual transmission. 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Acura Integra will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Acura Integra | 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C | |
Make | Acura | Alfa Romeo |
Model | Integra | 6C |
Year Released | 1996 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1797 cc | 2443 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 104 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2710 mm |