1996 Acura Integra vs. 1959 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1996 Acura Integra is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1996 Acura Integra. (138 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1996 Acura Integra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 955 kg more than 1996 Acura Integra. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Acura Integra | 1959 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Acura | Cadillac |
Model | Integra | 62 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1797 cc | 6382 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 2125 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 5730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 2040 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 3310 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 79 L |