1996 Acura Integra vs. 1959 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 1996 Acura Integra is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 940 kg more than 1996 Acura Integra.
Because 1959 Cadillac DeVille is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Cadillac DeVille. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Acura Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Acura Integra | 1959 Cadillac DeVille | |
| Make | Acura | Cadillac |
| Model | Integra | DeVille |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1959 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1797 cc | 6382 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 198 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 2110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 5730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 2040 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 3310 mm |
