1996 Acura Integra vs. 1969 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 1996 Acura Integra is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 4,950 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1969 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Acura Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Acura Integra | 1969 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Acura | Chevrolet |
Model | Integra | Camaro |
Year Released | 1996 | 1969 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1797 cc | 4950 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2750 mm |