1996 Acura Integra vs. 1981 Matra-Simca Murena
To start off, 1996 Acura Integra is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Matra-Simca Murena. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Matra-Simca Murena would be higher. At 2,154 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Matra-Simca Murena is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Acura Integra weights approximately 175 kg more than 1981 Matra-Simca Murena.
Because 1981 Matra-Simca Murena is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Matra-Simca Murena. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Acura Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Acura Integra has automatic transmission and 1981 Matra-Simca Murena has manual transmission. 1981 Matra-Simca Murena will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Acura Integra will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Acura Integra | 1981 Matra-Simca Murena | |
Make | Acura | Matra-Simca |
Model | Integra | Murena |
Year Released | 1996 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1797 cc | 2154 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 91 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 995 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1230 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2440 mm |