1996 Acura Integra vs. 1991 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 1996 Acura Integra is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 3,135 cc (6 cylinders), 1991 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 230 kg more than 1996 Acura Integra.
Because 1991 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1991 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Acura Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Acura Integra | 1991 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Acura | Chevrolet |
Model | Integra | Camaro |
Year Released | 1996 | 1991 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1797 cc | 3135 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 140 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2570 mm |