1996 Acura Integra vs. 2000 Chevrolet Suburban
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Suburban is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Acura Integra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Acura Integra would be higher. At 5,327 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Suburban is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Suburban weights approximately 1062 kg more than 1996 Acura Integra.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Suburban is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Chevrolet Suburban. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Acura Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Acura Integra | 2000 Chevrolet Suburban | |
| Make | Acura | Chevrolet |
| Model | Integra | Suburban |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1797 cc | 5327 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 282 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 9 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 2232 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 5580 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1930 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 3310 mm |
