1996 Acura Integra vs. 2003 Chevrolet SSR
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet SSR is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Acura Integra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Acura Integra would be higher. At 5,316 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet SSR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Chevrolet SSR weights approximately 984 kg more than 1996 Acura Integra.
Because 2003 Chevrolet SSR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Chevrolet SSR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Acura Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Acura Integra | 2003 Chevrolet SSR | |
Make | Acura | Chevrolet |
Model | Integra | SSR |
Year Released | 1996 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1797 cc | 5316 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 296 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 2154 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 2000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2950 mm |