1996 Acura Integra vs. 2008 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2008 Smart ForTwo is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Acura Integra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Acura Integra would be higher. At 1,797 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Acura Integra is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2008 Smart ForTwo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Smart ForTwo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Acura Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Acura Integra | 2008 Smart ForTwo | |
Make | Acura | Smart |
Model | Integra | ForTwo |
Year Released | 1996 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1797 cc | 999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 98 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 2730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 1870 mm |