1996 Acura Integra vs. 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Acura Integra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Acura Integra would be higher. At 5,300 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe weights approximately 1030 kg more than 1996 Acura Integra.
Because 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Acura Integra. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Acura Integra | 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe | |
Make | Acura | Chevrolet |
Model | Integra | Tahoe |
Year Released | 1996 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1797 cc | 5300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 320 HP |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 8 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 2200 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 5140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1960 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2950 mm |