1996 Acura Integra vs. 2010 Toyota Sienna
To start off, 2010 Toyota Sienna is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Acura Integra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Acura Integra would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Toyota Sienna is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Toyota Sienna weights approximately 765 kg more than 1996 Acura Integra.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Acura Integra | 2010 Toyota Sienna | |
Make | Acura | Toyota |
Model | Integra | Sienna |
Year Released | 1996 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1797 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 266 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 1935 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 5105 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1966 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 3030 mm |