1996 Acura Integra vs. 2013 Ford F-150
To start off, 2013 Ford F-150 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Acura Integra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Acura Integra would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford F-150 weights approximately 955 kg more than 1996 Acura Integra.
Because 2013 Ford F-150 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Ford F-150. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Acura Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Acura Integra | 2013 Ford F-150 | |
| Make | Acura | Ford |
| Model | Integra | F-150 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1797 cc | 3700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 298 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 3 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 2125 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 5415 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 2464 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1900 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 3200 mm |
