1996 Acura NSX vs. 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C
To start off, 1996 Acura NSX is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,977 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Acura NSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Acura NSX (271 HP @ 7300 RPM) has 177 more horse power than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. (94 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Acura NSX should accelerate faster than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 4 kg more than 1996 Acura NSX.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Acura NSX | 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C | |
Make | Acura | Alfa Romeo |
Model | NSX | 6C |
Year Released | 1996 | 1949 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 2977 cc | 2443 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 271 HP | 94 HP |
Engine RPM | 7300 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1374 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 5010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1580 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 3010 mm |