1996 Acura NSX vs. 2000 Ford ST 460
To start off, 2000 Ford ST 460 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Acura NSX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Acura NSX would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford ST 460 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford ST 460 (460 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 189 more horse power than 1996 Acura NSX. (271 HP @ 7300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford ST 460 should accelerate faster than 1996 Acura NSX.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Acura NSX (284 Nm) has 106 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford ST 460. (178 Nm). This means 1996 Acura NSX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford ST 460.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Acura NSX | 2000 Ford ST 460 | |
Make | Acura | Ford |
Model | NSX | ST 460 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 2977 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 271 HP | 460 HP |
Engine RPM | 7300 RPM | 6150 RPM |
Torque | 284 Nm | 178 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2580 mm |