1996 Alfa Romeo 145 vs. 1960 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1996 Alfa Romeo 145 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 1996 Alfa Romeo 145. (102 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1960 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1996 Alfa Romeo 145. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1065 kg more than 1996 Alfa Romeo 145. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Alfa Romeo 145 | 1960 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
Model | 145 | 62 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1370 cc | 6390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 102 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1135 kg | 2200 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 5730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3310 mm |