1996 Alfa Romeo 145 vs. 1962 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1996 Alfa Romeo 145 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 1996 Alfa Romeo 145. (102 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1996 Alfa Romeo 145. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 920 kg more than 1996 Alfa Romeo 145. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 458 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Alfa Romeo 145. (124 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Alfa Romeo 145.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Alfa Romeo 145 | 1962 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
| Model | 145 | 62 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1370 cc | 6388 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 102 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 124 Nm | 582 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1135 kg | 2055 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 5650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3300 mm |
