1996 Alfa Romeo 145 vs. 2001 Mazda CU-X
To start off, 2001 Mazda CU-X is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Alfa Romeo 145. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Alfa Romeo 145 would be higher. At 1,970 cc, 2001 Mazda CU-X is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Alfa Romeo 145 (102 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (99 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Alfa Romeo 145 should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda CU-X. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mazda CU-X weights approximately 210 kg more than 1996 Alfa Romeo 145.
Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mazda CU-X (240 Nm) has 116 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Alfa Romeo 145. (124 Nm). This means 2001 Mazda CU-X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Alfa Romeo 145.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Alfa Romeo 145 | 2001 Mazda CU-X | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Mazda |
Model | 145 | CU-X |
Year Released | 1996 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1370 cc | 1970 cc |
Horse Power | 102 HP | 99 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 124 Nm | 240 Nm |
Vehicle Weight | 1135 kg | 1345 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2680 mm |