1996 Alfa Romeo 145 vs. 2010 Chevrolet Tahoe
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Tahoe is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Alfa Romeo 145. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Alfa Romeo 145 would be higher. At 5,300 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Tahoe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Tahoe (320 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 218 more horse power than 1996 Alfa Romeo 145. (102 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Tahoe should accelerate faster than 1996 Alfa Romeo 145. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Tahoe weights approximately 1421 kg more than 1996 Alfa Romeo 145. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Chevrolet Tahoe (454 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 330 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Alfa Romeo 145. (124 Nm @ 4600 RPM). This means 2010 Chevrolet Tahoe will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Alfa Romeo 145.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Alfa Romeo 145 | 2010 Chevrolet Tahoe | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Chevrolet |
Model | 145 | Tahoe |
Year Released | 1996 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1370 cc | 5300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 102 HP | 320 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 124 Nm | 454 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Vehicle Weight | 1135 kg | 2556 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 5131 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 2007 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1953 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2946 mm |