1996 Alfa Romeo 155 vs. 2000 Chrysler ESX 3
To start off, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Alfa Romeo 155. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Alfa Romeo 155 would be higher. At 2,499 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Alfa Romeo 155 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Alfa Romeo 155 (493 HP @ 11700 RPM) has 419 more horse power than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. (74 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Alfa Romeo 155 should accelerate faster than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 weights approximately 580 kg more than 1996 Alfa Romeo 155.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 (332 Nm) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Alfa Romeo 155. (300 Nm). This means 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Alfa Romeo 155.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Alfa Romeo 155 | 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Chrysler |
| Model | 155 | ESX 3 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2499 cc | 1499 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 493 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 11700 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Torque | 300 Nm | 332 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1040 kg | 1620 kg |
