1996 Alfa Romeo 164 vs. 1958 Cadillac Sixty
To start off, 1996 Alfa Romeo 164 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 725 kg more than 1996 Alfa Romeo 164.
Because 1958 Cadillac Sixty is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Cadillac Sixty. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Alfa Romeo 164, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Alfa Romeo 164 | 1958 Cadillac Sixty | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
| Model | 164 | Sixty |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1958 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2968 cc | 5980 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 189 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 2235 kg |
