1996 Alfa Romeo 164 vs. 1962 Willys-Overland Dauphine
To start off, 1996 Alfa Romeo 164 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Willys-Overland Dauphine. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Willys-Overland Dauphine would be higher. At 2,968 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Alfa Romeo 164 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1962 Willys-Overland Dauphine is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Willys-Overland Dauphine. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Alfa Romeo 164, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Alfa Romeo 164 | 1962 Willys-Overland Dauphine | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Willys-Overland |
| Model | 164 | Dauphine |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1962 |
| Engine Size | 2968 cc | 843 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
