1996 Alfa Romeo 164 vs. 1963 Cadillac Biarritz
To start off, 1996 Alfa Romeo 164 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac Biarritz. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac Biarritz would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac Biarritz is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac Biarritz weights approximately 670 kg more than 1996 Alfa Romeo 164.
Because 1963 Cadillac Biarritz is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Cadillac Biarritz. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Alfa Romeo 164, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Alfa Romeo 164 | 1963 Cadillac Biarritz | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
| Model | 164 | Biarritz |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1963 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2968 cc | 6390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 197 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 2180 kg |
