1996 Alfa Romeo 164 vs. 1963 Simca 1300
To start off, 1996 Alfa Romeo 164 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Simca 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Simca 1300 would be higher. At 2,968 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Alfa Romeo 164 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Alfa Romeo 164 weights approximately 520 kg more than 1963 Simca 1300.
Because 1963 Simca 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Simca 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Alfa Romeo 164, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Alfa Romeo 164 | 1963 Simca 1300 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Simca |
| Model | 164 | 1300 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2968 cc | 1290 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 51 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 990 kg |
