1996 Alfa Romeo 164 vs. 1968 Lotus 49

To start off, 1996 Alfa Romeo 164 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Lotus 49. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Lotus 49 would be higher. At 2,993 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Lotus 49 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Alfa Romeo 164 weights approximately 994 kg more than 1968 Lotus 49.

Because 1968 Lotus 49 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Lotus 49. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Alfa Romeo 164, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Alfa Romeo 164 has automatic transmission and 1968 Lotus 49 has manual transmission. 1968 Lotus 49 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Alfa Romeo 164 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: