1996 Alfa Romeo 164 vs. 1975 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 1996 Alfa Romeo 164 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,968 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Alfa Romeo 164 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Alfa Romeo 164 weights approximately 550 kg more than 1975 Mazda RX-2.
Because 1975 Mazda RX-2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Mazda RX-2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Alfa Romeo 164, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Alfa Romeo 164 | 1975 Mazda RX-2 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Mazda |
Model | 164 | RX-2 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2968 cc | 2292 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 118 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 960 kg |