1996 Alfa Romeo 164 vs. 1988 Ford Ranger
To start off, 1996 Alfa Romeo 164 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,968 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Alfa Romeo 164 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1988 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Alfa Romeo 164. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Alfa Romeo 164 | 1988 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Ford |
Model | 164 | Ranger |
Year Released | 1996 | 1988 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2968 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 109 HP |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |