1996 Alfa Romeo 164 vs. 1989 Chevrolet Monte Carlo
To start off, 1996 Alfa Romeo 164 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Chevrolet Monte Carlo would be higher. At 4,300 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Alfa Romeo 164 weights approximately 30 kg more than 1989 Chevrolet Monte Carlo.
Because 1989 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Alfa Romeo 164, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Alfa Romeo 164 | 1989 Chevrolet Monte Carlo | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Chevrolet |
Model | 164 | Monte Carlo |
Year Released | 1996 | 1989 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2968 cc | 4300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 1480 kg |