1996 Alfa Romeo 164 vs. 2013 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2013 Volvo XC90 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Alfa Romeo 164. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Alfa Romeo 164 would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 627 kg more than 1996 Alfa Romeo 164.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Alfa Romeo 164 has automatic transmission and 2013 Volvo XC90 has manual transmission. 2013 Volvo XC90 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Alfa Romeo 164 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Alfa Romeo 164 | 2013 Volvo XC90 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Volvo |
| Model | 164 | XC90 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2968 cc | 3200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 237 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 2137 kg |
