1996 Alfa Romeo GTV vs. 2000 Ford ST 460
To start off, 2000 Ford ST 460 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Alfa Romeo GTV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Alfa Romeo GTV would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford ST 460 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford ST 460 (460 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 322 more horse power than 1996 Alfa Romeo GTV. (138 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford ST 460 should accelerate faster than 1996 Alfa Romeo GTV.
Because 2000 Ford ST 460 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford ST 460. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Alfa Romeo GTV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Alfa Romeo GTV (187 Nm) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford ST 460. (178 Nm). This means 1996 Alfa Romeo GTV will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford ST 460.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Alfa Romeo GTV | 2000 Ford ST 460 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Ford |
Model | GTV | ST 460 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1970 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 460 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 6150 RPM |
Torque | 187 Nm | 178 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2580 mm |