1996 Alfa Romeo Nuvola vs. 1983 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1996 Alfa Romeo Nuvola is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Alfa Romeo Nuvola is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Alfa Romeo Nuvola (300 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 207 more horse power than 1983 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Alfa Romeo Nuvola should accelerate faster than 1983 Mazda Cosmo.
Because 1996 Alfa Romeo Nuvola is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Mazda Cosmo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Alfa Romeo Nuvola will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Alfa Romeo Nuvola (386 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 237 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Mazda Cosmo. (149 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 1996 Alfa Romeo Nuvola will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Alfa Romeo Nuvola | 1983 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Mazda |
Model | Nuvola | Cosmo |
Year Released | 1996 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2492 cc | 1769 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 386 Nm | 149 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3300 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2620 mm |