1996 Alfa Romeo Nuvola vs. 2013 Volvo C30
To start off, 2013 Volvo C30 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Alfa Romeo Nuvola. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Alfa Romeo Nuvola would be higher. At 2,500 cc (5 cylinders), 2013 Volvo C30 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Alfa Romeo Nuvola (300 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 2013 Volvo C30. (224 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Alfa Romeo Nuvola should accelerate faster than 2013 Volvo C30.
Because 1996 Alfa Romeo Nuvola is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Volvo C30. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Alfa Romeo Nuvola will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Alfa Romeo Nuvola (386 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Volvo C30. (320 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 1996 Alfa Romeo Nuvola will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Volvo C30.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Alfa Romeo Nuvola | 2013 Volvo C30 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Volvo |
| Model | Nuvola | C30 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2492 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 300 HP | 224 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 386 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Top Speed | 275 km/hour | 240 km/hour |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4266 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 2039 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2640 mm |
