1996 Alpina B6 vs. 2002 Skoda Octavia
To start off, 2002 Skoda Octavia is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Alpina B6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Alpina B6 would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Alpina B6 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Alpina B6 weights approximately 145 kg more than 2002 Skoda Octavia.
Because 1996 Alpina B6 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Alpina B6. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Skoda Octavia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Alpina B6 | 2002 Skoda Octavia | |
Make | Alpina | Skoda |
Model | B6 | Octavia |
Year Released | 1996 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3200 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 113 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1365 kg | 1220 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2520 mm |