1996 Alpina B6 vs. 2004 MG ZT
To start off, 2004 MG ZT is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Alpina B6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Alpina B6 would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Alpina B6 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 MG ZT weights approximately 120 kg more than 1996 Alpina B6.
Because 1996 Alpina B6 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Alpina B6. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 MG ZT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Alpina B6 | 2004 MG ZT | |
| Make | Alpina | MG |
| Model | B6 | ZT |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3200 cc | 1796 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 158 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1365 kg | 1485 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4760 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2760 mm |
