1996 Alpina B6 vs. 2009 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2009 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Alpina B6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Alpina B6 would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Alpina B6 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2009 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Alpina B6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Alpina B6 | 2009 Mazda BT-50 | |
Make | Alpina | Mazda |
Model | B6 | BT-50 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3200 cc | 2953 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 154 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 3010 mm |