1996 Alpina B6 vs. 2010 Nissan Pathfinder
To start off, 2010 Nissan Pathfinder is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Alpina B6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Alpina B6 would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Nissan Pathfinder is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Nissan Pathfinder weights approximately 756 kg more than 1996 Alpina B6.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Nissan Pathfinder has automatic transmission and 1996 Alpina B6 has manual transmission. 1996 Alpina B6 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Nissan Pathfinder will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Alpina B6 | 2010 Nissan Pathfinder | |
Make | Alpina | Nissan |
Model | B6 | Pathfinder |
Year Released | 1996 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3200 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 266 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1365 kg | 2121 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4884 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1849 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1834 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2850 mm |