1996 Aston Martin Virage vs. 1963 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1996 Aston Martin Virage is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Aston Martin Virage (344 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 147 more horse power than 1963 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Aston Martin Virage should accelerate faster than 1963 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 90 kg more than 1996 Aston Martin Virage.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Aston Martin Virage | 1963 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Aston Martin | Cadillac |
| Model | Virage | 62 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5338 cc | 6390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 344 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 2090 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 5680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1430 mm |
