1996 Aston Martin Virage vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1996 Aston Martin Virage is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 5,338 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Aston Martin Virage is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Aston Martin Virage (344 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 214 more horse power than 1963 Triumph 2000. (130 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Aston Martin Virage should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Aston Martin Virage weights approximately 805 kg more than 1963 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Aston Martin Virage (450 Nm @ 3700 RPM) has 252 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph 2000. (198 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1996 Aston Martin Virage will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Aston Martin Virage | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Aston Martin | Triumph |
| Model | Virage | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5338 cc | 2498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 344 HP | 130 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 450 Nm | 198 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 1195 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1430 mm |
