1996 Aston Martin Virage vs. 1977 Austin Princess
To start off, 1996 Aston Martin Virage is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Austin Princess would be higher. At 5,338 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Aston Martin Virage is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Aston Martin Virage weights approximately 840 kg more than 1977 Austin Princess.
Because 1996 Aston Martin Virage is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Aston Martin Virage. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1977 Austin Princess, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Aston Martin Virage has automatic transmission and 1977 Austin Princess has manual transmission. 1977 Austin Princess will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Aston Martin Virage will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Aston Martin Virage | 1977 Austin Princess | |
Make | Aston Martin | Austin |
Model | Virage | Princess |
Year Released | 1996 | 1977 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5338 cc | 1700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 344 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 1160 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1420 mm |