1996 Aston Martin Virage vs. 1980 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 1996 Aston Martin Virage is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,030 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Aston Martin Virage weights approximately 90 kg more than 1980 Cadillac DeVille.
Because 1996 Aston Martin Virage is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Aston Martin Virage. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Aston Martin Virage | 1980 Cadillac DeVille | |
| Make | Aston Martin | Cadillac |
| Model | Virage | DeVille |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5338 cc | 6030 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 344 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 1910 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 5620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1950 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1420 mm |
