1996 Audi A3 vs. 1952 Talbot Saoutchik
To start off, 1996 Audi A3 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Talbot Saoutchik. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Talbot Saoutchik would be higher. At 4,480 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Talbot Saoutchik is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Talbot Saoutchik (169 HP) has 69 more horse power than 1996 Audi A3. (100 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1952 Talbot Saoutchik should accelerate faster than 1996 Audi A3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Talbot Saoutchik weights approximately 666 kg more than 1996 Audi A3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Talbot Saoutchik is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Talbot Saoutchik. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Audi A3 | 1952 Talbot Saoutchik | |
Make | Audi | Talbot |
Model | A3 | Saoutchik |
Year Released | 1996 | 1952 |
Engine Size | 1595 cc | 4480 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 169 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1134 kg | 1800 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 3160 mm |