1996 Audi A3 vs. 1954 Maserati A6G
To start off, 1996 Audi A3 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 1,984 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Maserati A6G is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Maserati A6G (168 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1996 Audi A3. (151 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1954 Maserati A6G should accelerate faster than 1996 Audi A3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Audi A3 weights approximately 400 kg more than 1954 Maserati A6G.
Because 1954 Maserati A6G is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Maserati A6G. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Audi A3 | 1954 Maserati A6G | |
Make | Audi | Maserati |
Model | A3 | A6G |
Year Released | 1996 | 1954 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 1984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 151 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 7400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1140 kg | 740 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2320 mm |