1996 Audi A3 vs. 1963 Jeep CJ5
To start off, 1996 Audi A3 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Audi A3 (100 HP) has 41 more horse power than 1963 Jeep CJ5. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 1963 Jeep CJ5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Audi A3 weights approximately 102 kg more than 1963 Jeep CJ5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Audi A3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Jeep CJ5 (145 Nm) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Audi A3. (136 Nm). This means 1963 Jeep CJ5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Audi A3.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Audi A3 | 1963 Jeep CJ5 | |
Make | Audi | Jeep |
Model | A3 | CJ5 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1963 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1595 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 59 HP |
Torque | 136 Nm | 145 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1134 kg | 1032 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 3520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2060 mm |