1996 Audi A3 vs. 1966 Bizzarrini A3C

To start off, 1996 Audi A3 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Bizzarrini A3C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Bizzarrini A3C would be higher. At 5,353 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Bizzarrini A3C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Bizzarrini A3C (361 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 210 more horse power than 1996 Audi A3. (151 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Bizzarrini A3C should accelerate faster than 1996 Audi A3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Bizzarrini A3C weights approximately 120 kg more than 1996 Audi A3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1966 Bizzarrini A3C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Bizzarrini A3C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Bizzarrini A3C (510 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 300 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Audi A3. (210 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 1966 Bizzarrini A3C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Audi A3.

Compare all specifications: