1996 Audi A3 vs. 1967 Bizzarrini A3C

To start off, 1996 Audi A3 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Bizzarrini A3C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Bizzarrini A3C would be higher. At 5,354 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Bizzarrini A3C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Bizzarrini A3C (361 HP) has 261 more horse power than 1996 Audi A3. (100 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Bizzarrini A3C should accelerate faster than 1996 Audi A3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Bizzarrini A3C weights approximately 126 kg more than 1996 Audi A3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1967 Bizzarrini A3C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Bizzarrini A3C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Bizzarrini A3C (510 Nm) has 374 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Audi A3. (136 Nm). This means 1967 Bizzarrini A3C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Audi A3.

Compare all specifications: