1996 Audi A3 vs. 1968 Nissan Bluebird

To start off, 1996 Audi A3 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 1,595 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Audi A3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Audi A3 (100 HP) has 38 more horse power than 1968 Nissan Bluebird. (62 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 1968 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Audi A3 weights approximately 229 kg more than 1968 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1968 Nissan Bluebird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Nissan Bluebird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Audi A3 (136 Nm) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Nissan Bluebird. (103 Nm). This means 1996 Audi A3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Nissan Bluebird.

Compare all specifications: