1996 Audi A3 vs. 1968 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 1996 Audi A3 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Nissan Cedric (114 HP) has 14 more horse power than 1996 Audi A3. (100 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Nissan Cedric should accelerate faster than 1996 Audi A3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 156 kg more than 1996 Audi A3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1968 Nissan Cedric (165 Nm) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Audi A3. (136 Nm). This means 1968 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Audi A3.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Audi A3 | 1968 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Audi | Nissan |
Model | A3 | Cedric |
Year Released | 1996 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1595 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 114 HP |
Torque | 136 Nm | 165 Nm |
Vehicle Weight | 1134 kg | 1290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2700 mm |