1996 Audi A3 vs. 1968 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 1996 Audi A3 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 1,595 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Audi A3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Audi A3 (100 HP) has 80 more horse power than 1968 Suzuki Fronte. (20 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 1968 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Audi A3 weights approximately 708 kg more than 1968 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Suzuki Fronte is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Suzuki Fronte. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Audi A3 (136 Nm) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Suzuki Fronte. (37 Nm). This means 1996 Audi A3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Audi A3 | 1968 Suzuki Fronte | |
| Make | Audi | Suzuki |
| Model | A3 | Fronte |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1968 |
| Engine Size | 1595 cc | 356 cc |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 20 HP |
| Torque | 136 Nm | 37 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1134 kg | 426 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 3000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1300 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 1970 mm |
