1996 Audi A3 vs. 1969 Bizzarrini Manta
To start off, 1996 Audi A3 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Bizzarrini Manta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Bizzarrini Manta would be higher. At 5,354 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Bizzarrini Manta is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Bizzarrini Manta (350 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 249 more horse power than 1996 Audi A3. (101 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Bizzarrini Manta should accelerate faster than 1996 Audi A3.
Because 1969 Bizzarrini Manta is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Bizzarrini Manta. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Bizzarrini Manta (510 Nm) has 366 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Audi A3. (144 Nm). This means 1969 Bizzarrini Manta will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Audi A3.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Audi A3 | 1969 Bizzarrini Manta | |
Make | Audi | Bizzarrini |
Model | A3 | Manta |
Year Released | 1996 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1595 cc | 5354 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 350 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 144 Nm | 510 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2510 mm |