1996 Audi A3 vs. 1974 Zastava 1300

To start off, 1996 Audi A3 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 1,781 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Audi A3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Audi A3 (151 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 1974 Zastava 1300. (59 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 1974 Zastava 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Audi A3 weights approximately 180 kg more than 1974 Zastava 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1974 Zastava 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Zastava 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Audi A3 (210 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 117 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm @ 3100 RPM). This means 1996 Audi A3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Zastava 1300.

Compare all specifications: