1996 Audi A3 vs. 1977 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 1996 Audi A3 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1977 Mazda RX-2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1977 Mazda RX-2 (118 HP) has 18 more horse power than 1996 Audi A3. (100 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1977 Mazda RX-2 should accelerate faster than 1996 Audi A3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Audi A3 weights approximately 174 kg more than 1977 Mazda RX-2.
Because 1977 Mazda RX-2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Mazda RX-2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1977 Mazda RX-2 (157 Nm) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Audi A3. (136 Nm). This means 1977 Mazda RX-2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Audi A3.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Audi A3 | 1977 Mazda RX-2 | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | A3 | RX-2 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1977 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1595 cc | 2292 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 118 HP |
Torque | 136 Nm | 157 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1134 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2480 mm |